Admissions
Enquiry to enrolled, on one record.
Your admissions CRM is a second copy of your student record, maintained by hand, reconciled by somebody’s Friday afternoon. Kestrel’s pipeline is the record itself.
The second copy.
Independent schools buy an admissions CRM because the SIS module is weak. That is a rational purchase and an entire market exists to serve it. The cost is that the same family now lives in two systems: entered in one, re-entered in the other, diverging quietly from the day the offer is accepted. Each enquiry becomes a record you will type twice and reconcile forever.
One pipeline, and it is the student record.
Waitlists that work the way independent schools work.
Most SIS waitlists are a date-ordered list. Yours is not, and pretending otherwise is why registrars keep a spreadsheet.
Tours, open days and interviews.
Bookable events with capacity limits, automatic reminders, check-in on the day, and the resulting attendance written to the enquiry record. Families who registered and did not come are a list worth having, and most schools cannot produce it.
Offers and acceptance.
What admissions creates.
This is the part registrars know and buyers underestimate. Admissions is where the family model gets built: who pays and in what proportion, which parent receives reports, which grandparent may collect, which sibling links to which discount. Get it right at application and the next thirteen years are clean. Get it wrong and the business office is still untangling it in Year 9.
It is also why a bolt-on CRM cannot solve this properly. The CRM captures an enquiry; it does not model a separated family with a court order and a split fee arrangement, because it was never designed to hold a record for thirteen years.
Most registrars have one waitlist or fee-split rule that no system has ever handled properly. Tell us yours and we will show you it working, or tell you plainly that it does not.
Show us your ruleYield, without asking anyone for a report.
Conversion by stage, by source and by campaign. Where enquiries come from, where they stall, and what proportion of offers are accepted by entry year. Ask it as a question: how many Year 7 2027 offers are still unaccepted? and get the rows, the same way as everywhere else in Kestrel.
You do not have to replace your SIS to use this.
Run Kestrel admissions beside the system you already have.
Replacing a student information system is a twelve-to-twenty-four month decision with a tender attached. Fixing admissions is not, and it is usually the part that hurts most.
Kestrel’s admissions layer runs standalone and pushes accepted applicants into Synergetic, TASS or your existing system, so your registrar gets the pipeline now and your school makes the larger decision on its own timetable. If you later move the whole record across, the admissions history is already here, because it was never anywhere else.
Bring your registrar.
Forty minutes, your enrolment policy, your waitlist rules.